Sign In

Communications of the ACM

ACM News

Jury Rules that NFTs Aren't Really Art

View as: Print Mobile App Share:
This case seems to boil down to one of the most well-known fashion houses in the world enforcing its ownership of its brand.

In the past year, the NFT market has plummeted even worse than the cryptocurrency market.

Credit: Hermes/Getty/Futurism

A new legal precedent just dropped in the case of Hermès versus Mason Rothschild, a self-described "conceptual artist" who used the company's iconic Birkin bags as a backdrop for his "MetaBirkins" non-fungible token (NFT) collection.

As the New York Times reports, Hèrmes won its lawsuit against the 28-year-old artist after he sold NFTs that featured the legendary handbag with all kinds of strange overlays, from a clear version that had a fetus edited into it to a fuzzy-handled one that had mammoth tusks.

A nine-person federal jury in Manhattan ruled this week that in spite of Rothschild's insistent cries of protected artistic expression, he had nevertheless infringed upon Hèrmes' copyright — and failed to meet a legal test used to determine what is and isn't art, too.

Using the Rogers test – named after the actress Ginger Rogers, who in 1989 sued filmmaker Alberto Grimaldi for using her trademarked name in the film "Ginger and Fred," only to have a jury rule that the filmmaker's use of her name was "artistically relevant" — the jurors in the "MetaBirkins" case determined that Rothschild's NFTs didn't meet that standard.

From Futurism
View Full Article



No entries found

Sign In for Full Access
» Forgot Password? » Create an ACM Web Account